8 5.41 10.eight 21.six 54.1 VA 1.10 5.50 11.0 22.0 55.0 B 1.22 6.12 12.two 24.five 61.2 T 1.21 six.03 12.1 24.1 60.three S 1.26 six.28 12.six 25.1 62.eight pX 1.20 5.99 12.0 24.0 59.9 mX 1.20 five.99 12.0 24.0 59.9 oX 1.20 five.98 12.0 23.9 59.eight MEK 1.12 5.58 11.2 22.3 55.8 MIBK 1.12 5.59 11.two 22.three 55.9 iBuAl 1.11 5.55 11.1 22.2 55.five BuAc 1.23 6.14 12.3 24.5 61.four PPA 1.37 6.86 13.7 27.4 68.six BTA 1.33 six.64 13.three 26.6 66.4 IVA 1.28 6.41 12.8 25.six 64.1 VLA 1.30 6.50 13.0 26.0 65.14 70 140 280Analysis volume: 1 LSensors 2013, 13 Table 3S. Comparison of calibration outcomes determined in the start and end of experiments: Response element (RF), coefficient of determination (R2), and relative normal errors (RSE).Order 1 2 three 4 5 6 7 8 9 ten 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Group Compound Exp_day 0 AA PA BA IA VA B T S pX mX oX MEK MIBK iBuAl BuAc PPA BTA IVA VLA Mean SD 522 12,017 43,572 66,125 59,322 131,760 168,602 188,198 188,510 197,068 198,376 48,980 117,383 93,667 113,114 25,574 71,259 99,441 79,615 RF Exp_day 9 497 11,950 43,467 65,836 59,804 131,280 165,819 191,709 184,038 193,888 194,140 48,566 117,646 92,778 117,791 26,963 67,832 94,589 78,950 Imply 509.Price of 1936429-06-9 five 11,984 43,520 65,981 59,563 131,520 167,211 189,954 186,274 195,478 196,258 48,773 117,515 93,223 115,453 26,269 69,546 97,015 79,283 CVb three.47 0.40 0.5-Bromobenzo[d]thiazol-2(3H)-one structure 17 0.31 0.57 0.26 1.18 1.31 1.70 1.15 1.53 0.60 0.16 0.67 two.86 three.74 3.48 three.54 0.59 1.46 1.29 Exp_day 0 0.9619 0.9991 0.9963 0.9962 0.9973 0.9909 0.9995 0.9995 0.9997 0.9992 0.9991 0.9969 0.9998 0.9969 0.9982 0.9977 0.9963 0.9965 0.9918 R2 Exp_day 9 0.9698 0.9991 0.9938 0.9932 0.9973 0.9930 0.9995 0.9997 0.9987 0.9994 0.9991 0.9987 0.9985 0.9972 0.9973 0.9953 0.9967 0.9935 0.9925 RSE a ( ) Imply 0.9659 0.9991 0.9951 0.9947 0.9973 0.PMID:33538985 9920 0.9995 0.9996 0.9992 0.9993 0.9991 0.9978 0.9992 0.9971 0.9978 0.9965 0.9965 0.9950 0.9922 0.9954 0.0075 2.52 three.49 1.05 1.93 1.35 two.06 0.83 1.32 0.49 0.56 0.73 1.79 0.85 1.73 0.79 1.68 0.13 2.09 0.97 1.39 0.AldehydeAromaticKetone Alcohol Ester Carboxyla bFive replicate analyses of 26.1 ng (imply mass) of analytes per 1 injection of FWS (4th calibration point) L CV (coefficient of variation) = SD/mean Sensors 2013, 13 Table 4S. Comparison of RF values involving actual experiment as well as the successful carbon number (ECN) method.Order Group Compounds Brief name C Ib Number of atom and functional groupa H O (C=O) (O) Jb Kb Lb Mb ECNc (CH3) Nb Actucal exp RF values ECN approachd PDe1 2 three 4 5 six 7 eight 9 ten 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18aAldehydeAcetaldehyde Propionaldehyde Butyraldehyde Isovaleraldehyde nValeraldehyde Benzene Toluene Styrene pXylene mXylene oXylene Methyl ethyl ketone Methyl isobutyl ketone Isobutyl alcohol nButyl acetate Propionic acid nButyric acid iValeric acid nValeric acidAA PA BA IA VA B T S pX mX oX MEK MIBK iBuAl BuAc PPA BTA IVA VLA2 three 4 five 5 6 7 8 8 8 8 4 six 4 6 three four 54 six 8 10 ten six eight eight 10 ten ten eight 12 ten 12 six six 101 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 two 2 two 21 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 two 1 0 1 0 2 2 2 two three two two 1 1 21.06 1.99 2.92 4.00 3.85 5.79 six.87 7.72 7.95 7.95 7.95 three.07 5.08 4.50 5.48 2.54 3.54 4.55 four.510 11,984 43,520 65,981 59,563 131,520 167,211 189,954 186,274 195,478 196,258 48,773 117,515 93,223 115,453 26,269 69,546 97,015 79,15,532 12,921 41,375 74,418 69,828 129,183 162,226 188,232 195,269 195,269 195,269 45,964 107,460 89,715 119,698 29,748 60,344 91,245 86,7.82 4.93 12.8 17.2 1.78 two.98 0.91 four.83 0.11 0.50 five.76 eight.56 3.76 three.68 13.2 13.2 five.95 9.AromaticKetone Alcohol Ester Fatty acidMean:six.52 .Auto.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *